RESULTS PATRIARCHS GENETIC DISTANCE DISCUSSION PERSONAL PEDIGREES SUBMITTED
TERRY FAMILY HISTORIAN TERRY GENFORUM TARRY GENFORUM TERRY GROUPS
TERRY - LINEAGE GROUP 8 - Discussion
Haplogroup I2a
(This is of course a
work in progress)
"Richard Terry, the immigrant
Born in England about 1618, may have been August 17, 1618. Died on his farm "Quashaneck" near Southold, Long Island, about May 1676. His will dated July 6, 1675 was proved at Southold May 13, 1676. Came to America in 1635 sailing from London on the ship James on July 13th. The three Terry's on the ship, Thomas age 28, Robert age 25 and Richard age 17, are supposed to have been brothers. They landed at Salem, Massachusetts. Richard remained there a short time, then removed to Springfield, thence to Lynn, and finally in 1640 to Southold, being one of the original thirteen settlers. Thomas Terry afterwards settled at Southold. Robert Terry settled at Flushing, Long Island.
Richard Terry was recorder of the Southold Town and clerk of the court from 1664 to 1673. He recorded the names and births of his children on the Town records married May 22, 1649/50 Abigail Lines, name variously spelled Loines, Line, Lyune, Lind, etc. She was probable the daughter of Ralph Lines who died in New Haven in 1640. She was living with her son John in Quashaneck farm in 1683."
Will of Richard and Thomas Terry of Long Island.... Some New York Terry information...
O 0 0 O 0 0 O
Individuals in this group who have DNA tested as of November 06, 2009: T-7, T-64 and T-77. It appears this haplogroup will be I2a. We now have 67 marker results for T-7, T-64 and T-77. Please see Long Island, New York Terry Group.
Richard Terry b 17 Aug 1618 - London, England d 1675 - Southold, NY m Abigail Lines – John Terry [jpterry2005 AT msn.com]
Nathaniel
Terry b Jan 1656 - Suffolk, NY d 23 Oct 1723 - Southold, NY m
Mary
Horton
Nathaniel
Terry b 16 Nov 1683 - Cutchogue, NY d 17 Dec 1722 - Southold, NY m Ann
Armstrong
Jonathan
Terry b 1707 - Southold, NY d 16 Nov 1753 - Southold, NY m Jemima
Parshall
Parshall
Terry b 8 Aug 1734 - New London, CT d 15 May 1811 East
Palmyra, NY m Deborah Clark
Parshall
Terry b 22 Feb 1756 - Mattituck, NY d 23 Jul 1808 -
Windham, CT m Amy
Stevens
Parshall
Terry 3rd b 30 Sept 1778 - Fort Niagra,
NY d 8 Oct 1861 - Draper, UT m Hannah
Terry
Joshua
Terry b 11 Aug 1825 - Alibion, Canada d 22 Feb
1915 - Draper, UT m Mary
Emma Reid
Joshua
Parshall Terry b 3 Apr 1860 - Draper, UT d 6
Dec 1941 - SLC, UT m Amelia
Charles
LaGrand
Redell Terry b 11 Mar 1899 - Draper, UT
d 26 Oct 1991 - SLC, UT m Clara
Leah Stringfellow
Vaughn
LaGrand Terry b 11 Sept 1926 - SLC,
UT d 26 Nov 1998 - SLC, UT m Peggy
Sue Roche
Living
Terry T-64
| In comparing 67 markers, the probability that T-7 and T-77 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 8.6% | 44.72% | 77.11% | 92.6% | 97.97% | 95.72% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show 4 mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 -30 years. |
|||||
| In comparing 67 markers, the probability that T-77 and T-64 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 46.21% | 85.45% | 97.06% | 99.49% | 99.92% | 99.99% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show 2 mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 -30 years. |
|||||
| In comparing 67 markers, the probability that T-7 and T-64 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 3.02% | 27.49% | 61.96% | 84.81% | 94.99% | 98.56% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show 5 mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 -30 years. |
|||||
The FTDNATiP results are based on the mutation rate study
presented during the 1st International Conference on Genetic Genealogy, on
Oct. 30, 2004. The above probabilities take into consideration the mutation
rates for each individual marker being compared.