RESULTS PATRIARCHS GENETIC DISTANCE DISCUSSION PERSONAL PEDIGREES SUBMITTED
TERRY FAMILY HISTORIAN TERRY GENFORUM TARRY GENFORUM TERRY GROUPS
TERRY - LINEAGE GROUP 5 - Discussion
Haplogroup G2a
(This is of course a
work in progress)
Individuals in this group who have DNA tested as of September 29, 2007: T-22, T-35 and T-44
These individuals who have tested are linked to John Terry born about 1740 in New Jersey. The persons in this group are distinct in that their haplogroup G2 is rare among Europeans. From this information alone you can definitely say they are not related to the Southside Virginia Terry men in Group 1 in the study [haplogroup I1b] nor the northern branches of Terry men out of early Long Island, New York even though they have only tested 12 markers. Since we have very close genetic distance in this group between documented brothers this confirms the modal values for this group.
There is quite a bit on several family members by the late Robert Ward Terry (1813 - 1987) who was a frequent contributor to Terry Family Historian quarterly (1982-1988) which is now on line. You can find his articles by searching for "Covering the Terry-Tory" with the quotes in the search box on the TFH homepage .
There is a link at RootsWeb which is particularly enlightening indicating John and Ruth Terry were of the Dividing Creek Baptist Church, Cumberland County, New Jersey -- Note regarding John and Ansel Terry and Dividing Creek Church There are records I believe to substantiate several of the relationships listed below although I do not have a list of them. If any family members have deed, will or marriage citations I would appreciate hearing from you so we can post the information. See also Bryce Henderson Stevens page on Terry Family .
So early descendants of this Terry family can be found in New Jersey, Ohio, Kentucky, Missouri and Indiana.
Reuben
Terry b 29 Sep 1840 Callaway Co MO m 06 Oct 1881 Melissa Guy
Beeding (widow) d Mar 1920 Mono Co CA rancher/lumberman
Reuben
Clinton Terry b 05 May 1884 Mono Co CA m 05 Feb 1906
Olive Blanche Green d 18 Feb 1930 Lyon Co NV rancher
Living Terry b 21 Jul 1922 Wellington Lyon Co NV m 13 Feb 1943 m Living Hall NV banker retired
Living Terry b 10 Sep 1945 Alameda Co CA medical technologist
Living Terry b 16 Dec 1975 Hood River, Oregon actuary
Living Terry b 28 Jan 2003 Vancouver, Washington T-35
The genetic distance of
0 between T-22, T-35 and T-44 utilizing 37 markers indicates they are "very tightly related". This is expected based on the documentation provided by family members and should be particularly reassuring to others who may be skeptical about DNA matches among close family members. This Terry family group is in a good position to match with others in Europe or with those Terry families who may have originated from the New Jersey area or any of the Kentucky counties listed in the pedigrees.
| In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-22, T-35 and T-44 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 58.88% | 88.97% | 97.45% | 99.45% | 99.89% | 99.98% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
| In comparing 67 markers, the probability that T-22 and T-44 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 71.54% | 95.15% | 99.3% | 99.91% | 99.99% | 100% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
The most recent common ancestor for T-22 and T-44 is Robert Jackson Terry b. 10 Apr 1832 Franklin Co.,IN, d. 9 Dec 1897 Jameson, MO, m.#1 Mary C Hammons, #2 Susan M Hammons.
T-44 had a mutation somewhere after Robert Jackson TERRY. I have spoken to the president of familytreedna.com and he stated that he is a one mutation difference from his brother. You never know where a mutation will happen. It is interesting that T-22 is genetically closer to a more distant connection, T-35. - Sharol Terry Pestotnik in an email to Mike Terry on 30 Sep 2007.
| In comparing 67 markers, the probability that T-35 and T-44 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 71.54% | 95.15% | 99.3% | 99.91% | 99.99% | 100% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
The most recent common ancestor for these two persons who tested is John Terry who died about 1795 in Cincinnati, Ohio who originated from the state of New Jersey. T-35 and T-22 are a genetic distance of 1. This indicates they are "Tightly Related", both with traditional genealogy and genetic DNA tests.
| In comparing 67 markers, the probability that T-35 and T-22 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 89.79% | 98.96% | 99.89% | 99.99% | 100% | 100% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
The most recent common ancestor for all three persons who tested is John Terry who died about 1795 in Cincinnati, Ohio who originated from the state of New Jersey. T-35 and T-22 are a genetic distance of 0. This indicates they are "Very Tightly Related", both with traditional genealogy and genetic DNA tests. This is the first 100 percent match we have had on 67 markers in the Terry DNA Project. These two tests combined are the modal values for the common ancestor in Group 5.
The FTDNATiP results are based on the mutation rate study
presented during the 1st International Conference on Genetic Genealogy, on
Oct. 30, 2004. The above probabilities take into consideration the mutation
rates for each individual marker being compared.