RESULTS PATRIARCHS GENETIC DISTANCE DISCUSSION PERSONAL PEDIGREES SUBMITTED
TERRY FAMILY HISTORIAN TERRY GENFORUM TARRY GENFORUM TERRY GROUPS
TERRY LINEAGE GROUP 1 - Discussion
Haplogroup I2a
(This is of course a work in progress)
Southside
Virginia refers to the south-central
part of the state, roughly bounded by the James River on the north, the Blue
Ridge Mountains on the west, and the South
Hampton Roads area on the east. The major center of the "Southside
Virginia" area is generally considered to be Danville.
It appears most of the families in this group are genetically early Terry
families in the region called "Southside Virginia". Source: Wikpedia
the Free Encyclopedia
Individuals in this group who have DNA tested as of June 19, 2008: T-2, T-3, T-9, T-10,T-11, T-16, T-17, T-18, T-20, T-21, T-23, T-24, T-31, T-38, T-40, T-42, T-43, T-45, T-46, T-50, T-51, T-55 and T-57.
Stephen
Terry, b ca1700, Hanover CO., VA - Bryan Terry [bterry AT altlngusa.com] T-10
Stephen
had documented sons from deeds as follows: James Terry and Roland Terry.
Based on DNA evidence and documentation this particular Stephen Terry is related to everyone in the group. We are unable at this point to determine who his father might be. There are documents in Hanover and Louisa County Virginia tying this man to descendants in Granville County, North Carolina. His age is estimated based on the estimated ages of two of his male children: James d. 1783 Louisa Co. Virginia and Rowland Terry later of Granville County, North Carolina. There is no evidence indicating Stephen Terry of Hanover ever lived in Granville Co. North Carolina. This Stephen Terry d. after 1763 and before 1783 as his son James Terry in his Will [Louisa Co. Virginia Book 2, page 493 written 11 Aug 1783 and proven 11 Aug 1783] indicates “that my wife possess during her life that part of my estate that falls to me in the division of my father’s estate….”
Roland or Rowland Terry's ancestors migrated from Granville County, North Carolina to Jackson/Putnam Counties, Tennessee. There are many descendants in this area today. The late Jay Terry of Orem, Utah and the late Woodford Terry of Oakridge, Tennessee are of this line. Both T-24 Benjamin Terry b. ca 1700 d. 1771 Pittsylvania Co. VA m Elizabeth [probably Dickerson] and T-42 Stephen Terry b ca 1790 m ca 1810 Martha Bracken d abt 1825 match on 37/37 markers with T-10. The link to the right will take you to: Granville County Records.
| In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-10 and T-24/T-42/T-50 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 83.49% | 97.28% | 99.55% | 99.93% | 99.99% | 100% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
Roland D. Terry lived his entire life in Alabama. His parents are
unproven at this time; however, he matches
perfectly on the first 12 markers with 13 individuals in the group. Basically,
the first 12 DYS marker values which define this group are 13, 23,
15,10,12,15,11,15,12,13,11,
29. On the 37 marker test he is a 100 percent match with T-10,
T-24,
and
T-42. A genetic distance of 0 indicates these individualas are
"Tightly Related" according to Family Tree DNA. We are awaiting
death certificate information which may name his parents.
John W. Terry, b
between 1808-1810 VA d 28 Nov 1884 Hanover Co. VA -
Richard W. Terry, Jr. [rickterry349 AT adelphia.net] T-38
John W. Terry lived his entire life in Hanover
County, Virginia. His parents are unknown; however, he matches
perfectly on the first 12 markers with 13 individuals in the group. Basically,
the first 12 DYS marker values which define this group are 13, 23,
15,10,12,15,11,15,12,13,11,
29. We
now have 37 marker test for T-38
and a comparison with
T-20 is shown..
| In comparing 12markers, the probability that T-38 and T-2, T-3, T-10,T-11, T-17, T-18, T-20, T-21, T-24, T-40, T-42, T-43,T-45 and T-50 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 33.57% | 55.88% | 70.69% | 80.53% | 87.07% | 91.41% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
| In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-38 and T-20 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 58.88% | 88.97% | 97.45% | 99.45% | 99.89% | 99.98% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
This result seems to confirm a close relationship between Stephen Terry d. 1769 in South Carolina and the Hanover County, Virginia John Terry with a genetic distance of 1 or "Tightly Related". A genetic distance of 2 exists or "Related" between T-38 and T-9 George W. Terry, T-10 Rowland Terry, T-11 Josiah or Joseph Terry, T-24 Benjamin Terry and T-42 Stephen Terry and suggests a relationship with the Pittsylvania/Halifax County, Virginia Terrys. Of course, we do have documents concerning Stephen Terry who died sometime between 1763-1783 of Hanover who deeded property in Granville County, North Carolina to his son Rowland Terry T-10 and James Terry of Louisa. This is of course not the T-2 and T-20 Stephen Terry who died in 1769 in Craven or Chester County, South Carolina. However, they are genetically related as results indicate.
| In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-38 and T-9 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 31.97% | 72.4% | 91.31% | 97.62% | 99.4% | 99.86% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years.Note: The results for T-10, T-11, T-24 and T-42 are very similar and do not differ significantly from the results shown in the table above. |
|||||
OoooOoooO
Benjamin
Terry,
b c 1701 m Elizabeth [probably Dickerson] d 1771 Pittsylvania Co. VA - David K. Terry [dkt4ster AT hotmail.com] T-24
Benjamin Terry had documented sons in his Will
of 1771 as follows: Nathaniel, Benjamin, Peter, Joseph and Robert Terry.
Benjamin Terry is one of the oldest "documented" Terry ancestors in the group from Virginia and he perfectly matches the modal values for Group 1 indicating he is the closest match to the MRCA (Most recent common ancestor) for the whole group. Benjamin’s oldest son Nathaniel Terry (1725-1778) married Sarah Royall. Nathaniel Terry was a member of the House of Burgesses and of the House of Delegates. He died, Halifax County, Virginia. This older Benjamin Terry had a daughter Sarah Terry who married Champness Terry, the son of Joseph Terry died about Dec 1785 Pittsylvania County, Virginia and his wife Judith Crawford. This Champness Terry died between 1775 and 1779 in South Carolina. Champness and Sarah had a son also named Champness (1772-1820) who died in St. Helena Parish, Louisiana.
The link to the right will take you to records about Benjamin Terry: South Side Terry Families
Benjamin
Terry b c 1700 d. 1771 Pittsylvania Co. VA m Elizabeth [probably
Dickerson] - Margie Brown -
[mgbrown105@aol.com]
See notes above for
T-24.
OoooOoooO
Stephen
Terry, b
ca 1700 VA d aft Feb 1762 - William P. Terry [wterry AT
dccnet.com] T-21
This person has only tested 12 markers; however,
documents are available indicating he is a traditional cousin of T-10.
For this reason he is included in Group 1. In
addition he has a double Terry line as both his maternal and paternal Terry
ancestors were related.
OoooOoooO
Stephen
Terry, b ca 1724 m Sarah ??, d 19 Dec 1769 Craven Co. SC - Robert Mike Terry [mterry3158 AT
sbcglobal.net] T-2
Stephen Terry had documented
sons as follows: John who died in Chester County, South Carolina and Benjamin
Terry who died in Abbeville County, South Carolina..
This is the Co-Coordinator of the Terry DNA
Project and former editor of the Terry Family Historian. Web master for the
Terry Family Historian web site. See the notes for the same individual below for
my cousin Mary Webster T-20.
Stephen
Terry, m Sarah ??, d 19 Dec 1769 Craven Co. SC
- Mary
Terry Webster [bee-gard AT att.net]
T-20
The male individuals who tested in this study T-2 and
T-20
are 3rd cousins twice
removed. Their most recent common ancestor is known and there is a definite
date of 1788 which is the year of birth for Major Stephen Terry later of Atlanta,
Georgia. The estimated age of this older Stephen Terry is based on the age of
his first son John Terry (1752-1834) of Chester County, South Carolina. There is no indication in records I have
seen in 30 or more years of research indicating where the family originated from
in the American Colonies. Obviously, now in 2006-2007 we know it is Virginia.
We know this older Stephen Terry was a carpenter and received early grants in
Craven County now Chester County, South Carolina in 1762. The older Stephen Terry married the widow of
George Glover, Susannah Glover nee Mitchell, shortly after his wife Sarah died. It is
important to note both George Glover and Susannah Mitchell’s parents were of Granville, North
Carolina. The last name of Sarah the
first wife of this older Stephen Terry is not known. Some have suggested
Sarah Davis and Sarah Fuqua neither of which I believe to be true.
Note by Mike Terry, the editor: I think the benefits of the 67 marker update are apparent several places in Group 1. There are mutations that happened in my family after 1788 as I stated above. My cousin’s test (T-20) is much closer to Benjamin Terry (T-24) than mine. On 67 markers my test shows a genetic distance between (T-2 and T-24) of 3 and conversely I am a genetic distance of 4 with my documented cousin (T-2 and T-20). However, T-20 my cousin and T-24 are a genetic distance of 2. If you look at the specific markers where T-20 differs from T-24, you will notice T-2 markers are congruent with T-24 in those places. Without the additional markers we would not have known this. I believe this is also true for the Lawrence Co. Alabama Terry descendants who have tested in Group 1. Some of them have mutations later in the lines and some are closer to Benjamin Terry T-24 as well. I suspect if these men upgrade you will also be able to see where the mutations may have occurred. Many of the differences are in the red marker areas where we would expect faster mutations. -- This leads me to think some of us are much closer than the actual test results may suggest in Group 1.
| In comparing 67 markers, the probability that T-20 and T-24 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 71.27% | 95.04% | 99.27% | 99.9% | 99.99% | 100% |
|
*The probabilities were based on the fact the two individuals did not share a common ancestor in the last 4 generations. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
Stephen Terry, d. 12 Dec 1769, Chester
Co., SC, m.(1) Sarah ____ - Stephen Mark Hunter [markhunterbburg AT yahoo.com]
This
individual is a cousin of T-20 and T-2. Mark Hunter is related through both Benjamin Terry (1755 –
1831) and John Terry (1752-1834) sons
of Stephen Terry d. 1769. Both his Hunter and Terry families removed from
Chester County to Abbeville County, South Carolina and were there for several
years after 1830. This Benjamin Terry did marry 05 Aug 1777, Susannah
Caruthers in Guilford County, North Carolina. As far as we know, this Benjamin
Terry had no male heirs and his daughter Sarah Terry married her first cousin
Jeremiah Sealy Terry (1778-1823), the son of John (1752-1834) by his first wife Sarah Sealy (1757-1778).
For
an excellent insight into plantation life at the time see Mark Hunter's website
about family of Alexander
Hunter.
OoooOoooO
William
Hamilton Terry, b. ca 1824 Limestone Co. AL m Evelina
Tabitha Taylor d. ca 1885 Madison Co TN - Carolyn Kemp [chilkoot
AT speednetllc.com] T-17
The
sons of William Hamilton Terry are as follows: William Webster, James H. and
John Terry.
It
is not known how this person fits in with any known documents; however, the
ancestor is a perfect 37/37 or genetic distance of 0 match with T-2
Stephen
Terry, m Sarah ??, d 19 Dec 1769 Craven Co. SC.
The family of William H. Terry migrates from Limestone County, Alabama to Tennessee where we also find other
Terry's from Lawrence County and Limestone County, Alabama. A comparison of T-17
with T-42
Stephen Terry b ca 1790 m ca 1810 Martha
Bracken d abt 1825 is
also shown below. See Lawrence County, Alabama
family of Elisha Terry.
| In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-2 and T-17 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 83.49% | 97.28% | 99.55% | 99.93% | 99.99% | 100% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-42 and T-17 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 56.46% | 84.4% | 96.84% | 99.26% | 99.83% | 99.96% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show 1 mismatch. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
The FTDNATiP results are based on the mutation rate study presented during the 1st International Conference on Genetic Genealogy, on Oct. 30, 2004. The above probabilities take into consideration the mutation rates for each individual marker being compared.
OoooOoooO
Stephen
Terry, b 1787 NC m. Martha Patience Breeland
- Kay Terry [terry5613 AT
bellsouth.net] T-18
Sons
of Stephen Terry are as follows; Sanford Raimey and Abraham Breeland Terry.
This
individual (T-18)
is a genetic distance of 3 on 37 markers with
T-10
Stephen
Terry, b
ca 1700 VA d aft Feb 1762;
T-24
Benjamin
Terry
b c 1700 d. 1771 Pittsylvania Co. VA; T-42
Stephen
Terry b
ca 1790 m ca 1810 Martha Bracken d abt 1825 and
T-46 William
B. Terry,
b 1797 d 1878 Orange Co NC.
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-18, T-10 and T-24 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 11.95% | 46.97% | 76.02% | 90.95% | 96.97% | 99.06% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show 1 mismatch. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-18 and T-46 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 13.29% | 50.17% | 78.82% | 92.54% | 97.68% | 99.34% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show 1 mismatch. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
Benjamin Terry had a daughter Sarah Terry who married Champness Terry, the son of Joseph Terry died about Dec 1785 Pittsylvania County, Virginia and his wife Judith Crawford. This Champness Terry died between 1775 and 1779 in South Carolina. Champness and Sarah had a son also named Champness (ca 1772-1820) who died in St. Helena Parish, Louisiana. His wife Hanna Musgrove is in the 1840 census of Washington Parish LA. He had a number of slave purchases/sales from this area 1803-1818 Afro-Louisiana History and Genealogy 1718-1820. Type the name Terry in the Master's name search box and you will see Champness was buying slaves from a William Coleman. Stephen Terry (T-18) is in the St. Tammany Parish census in 1840. St. Tammany included what is now Washington Parish (1819) and Tangiapahoa Parish (1869).
While we have no documentation these Terry men are related; I would suggest they would probably be "genetic cousins" if we were to find male Terry descendants.
The link to the right will take you to records about Benjamin Terry: South Side Terry Families The information about the Champness Terry and Hanna Musgrove family was from Margie Brown.
OoooOoooO
Josiah
Terry, b.
c1800 NC m. Suvicy Perry - Stephen Terry [sdterry AT eos.ncsu.edu] T-11
Sons
of Josiah Terry are as follows: William H., James Anderson and Joseph Terry.
This
individual Terry family has been in the Wake County, North Carolina area
for generations. T-11 has a genetic distance of 1 with T-20
Stephen
Terry, b ca 1724 m Sarah ??, d 19 Dec 1769 Craven Co. SC.
There are no documents indicating any relationship between the families. Josiah
is sometimes noted as Joseph Terry in the records of Wake County. A comparison
of T-11
Josiah
Terry with T-24
Benjamin
Terry
b c 1700 d. 1771 Pittsylvania Co. VA m Elizabeth [probably
Dickerson] indicates
a genetic distance of 2. The link to the right will take you to records
concerning this family: Wake
County, North Carolina Records.
| In comparing 67 markers, the probability that T-11 and T-20 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations |
16 generations |
20 generations | 24 generations |
| 71.89% | 95.28% | 99.33% | 99.91% | 99.99% | 100% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show 1 mismatch. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
| In comparing 67 markers, the probability that T-11 and T-24 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations |
16 generations |
20 generations | 24 generations |
| 46.21% | 85.45% | 97.06% | 99.49% | 99.92% | 99.99% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show 2 mismatch. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
OoooOoooO
George W.
Terry b 1805 NC, m Ada Elam d. 1841 Panola Co. MS - C. Morris Terry [hildieterry AT aol.com] T-9
Sons
of George W. Terry are as follows: William E. and Robert Terry
The
ancestor of this family is unknown. At one time it was thought the family
might be related to the Lawrence Co. Alabama group. Recent tests indicate
this may still be true.
On a 37 marker comparison T-9
George W.
Terry b 1805
NC is a genetic distance of 1 (tightly
related) with T-20 Stephen
Terry, b ca 1724 m Sarah ??, d 19 Dec 1769 Craven Co.
SC and
a genetic distance of 2 (related) with T-10
Stephen
Terry, b
ca 1700 VA d aft Feb 1762,
T-24 Benjamin
Terry
b c 1700 d. 1771 Pittsylvania Co. VA m Elizabeth [probably
Dickerson] ,
T-42
Stephen Terry b ca 1790 m ca 1810 Martha
Bracken d abt 1825
and T-11 Josiah
Terry, b.
c1800 NC m. Suvicy Perry .
This means he is closer to the modal values of
Benjamin Terry and Stephen Terry m. Martha Bracken.
|
In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-9 and T-20 shared a common ancestor within the last.... |
|||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 59.17% | 898.14% | 97.51% | 99.47% | 99.89% | 99.98% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
|
In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-9 and T-24, T-10, T-42 shared a common ancestor within the last.... |
|||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 31.6% | 71.97% | 91.07% | 97.53% | 99.37% | 99.85% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
|
In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-9 and T-11 shared a common ancestor within the last.... |
|||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 32.45% | 72.96% | 91.61% | 97.74% | 99.44% | 99.87% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
? Terry, b. c1760 VA - James L Terry [JTerry4772 AT aol.com]
Henderson
Terry, b. c1793 NC, d. c1855, Lawrence Co., AL T-3
It
is believed Henderson Terry T-3,
Joseph T-45 and
Stephen Terry
T-42 are
brothers and the children of Nancy Terry and husband unknown. See Lawrence
County Alabama Descendants. James L. Terry has large database of descendants
of Nancy Terry and her husband.
| In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-3 and T-10, T-24, T-42 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 57.45% | 88.06% | 97.1% | 99.35% | 99.86% | 99.97% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
Stephen Terry b ca 1790 m ca 1810 Martha
Bracken d abt 1825 - Billy D. Terry [Cupt104 AT aol.com] T-42
Stephen
Terry had sons as follows: William C., John Franklin, Thomas, Stephen,
John Tobe, Edward, Squire Coleman and John H. Terry.
It
is believed Henderson Terry T-3,
Joseph T-45 and
Stephen Terry
T-42 are
brothers and the children of Nancy Terry and husband unknown. See Lawrence
County Alabama Descendants. There is a very large contingent of Terry
descendants out of this Alabama county.
This seems to be born out by the DNA results to date which is to be expected as there is traditional documentation to support the family ties.
A genetic distance of 0 on 37 markers between T-42 Stephen Terry b ca 1790 m ca 1810 Martha Bracken d abt 1825, T-10 Stephen Terry, b ca1700, Hanover CO., VA and T-24 Benjamin Terry b c 1700 d. 1771 Pittsylvania Co. VA is very interesting suggesting these men are "related". Prior to the test by T-42, T-3 did not seem to be a very close match. It suggests there were mutations in the family of T-3 Henderson Terry occurring in later generations. It would be very interesting to see how increased testing by members in the Lawrence County, Alabama Group might match the modal values for Group 1.
| In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-10 and T-24/T-42 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 83.49% | 97.28% | 99.55% | 99.93% | 99.99% | 100% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
Stephen
Terry b. abt 1790 NC m.
Martha Bracken - Sharon
T. Engle [sengle00 AT aol.com]
See discussion for T-3, T-42 and T-45.
Joseph Terry b Abt. 1806 in NC? m 11 Sep 1832 Rebecca Love d 18 Sep 1881 in Lawrence Co, AL - Zach C. Terry, Paster – [zach AT lanbaptist.org] T-45
Sons of Joseph
Terry are as follows: John William, Henderson Stephen F., Joseph E., Roland,
James Monroe, Thomas B. and John Terry.
It is believed Henderson Terry T-3 Henderson
Terry, b. c1793
NC,
T-45
Joseph Terry b Abt. 1806 in NC? and
T-42 Stephen
Terry b. abt 1790 NC m.
Martha Bracken are
brothers and the children of Nancy Terry and husband unknown. See Lawrence
County Alabama Descendants. T-45 matches
perfectly on the first 12 markers with 13 individuals in the group. Basically,
the first 12 DYS marker values which define this group are 13, 23,
15,10,12,15,11,15,12,13,11,
29. As of December, 23, 2007, T-45
matches 25/25 markers to T-42. If
the next 12 markers for T-42 are
consistent with T-42
markers then the results will match the 37 marker table probability
above.
OoooOoooO
Gideon Terry, b abt 1753, d 1821 King William Co., VA m Mary Unknown, bef 1786 James William Terry [jwterry99 AT yahoo.com] T-16 Male sons of Gideon Terry were named as follows: James E., John, Stephen and William A. Terry.
T-16
Gideon
Terry was a Revolutionary War Veteran - Source: Series: M805 Roll 794 image 607
File: S41237 page 1 of 7. Heritage Quest Online. About half of the images are
very faint and unreadable:
GIDEON
TERRY
KING WILLIAM'S COUNTY
PRIVATE
VIRGINIA LINE
$96.00 ANNUAL ALLOWANCE
$65.83 AMOUNT RECEIVED NOVEMBER 6, 1819
PENSION STARTED AGE 67
SUSPENDED MAY 1, 1820
Source: Virginia Pension Roll of 1835 Rootsweb
Accessed May 25, 2007
A comparison between T-16 Gideon Terry and T-24 Benjamin Terry d. 1771 is shown below. There is a genetic distance of 2 which indicates the individuals are "Tightly Related". No paper trail exists as far as we know to show the relationship.
| In comparing 67 markers, the probability that T-16 and T-24 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 46.82% | 85.88% | 97.21% | 99.53% | 99.93% | 99.99% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
A 37 marker comparison of T-16 Gideon Terry of King William Co VA, T-10 Stephen Terry of Hanover Co VA, T-24 Benjamin Terry of Pittsylvania Co VA and T-42 Stephen Terry of Lawrence Co AL is shown below. They are a genetic distance of 1 from one another defined by FTDNA as "Tightly Related".
| In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-16, T-10, T-24, T-42 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 59.2% | 89.16% | 97.52% | 99.47% | 99.89% | 99.98% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
One would expect if T-38 John W. Terry of Hanover Co VA is related to the T-10 Stephen Terry of Hanover Co VA there would a closer match with this group a genetic distance of 3. Please note DYS #458 value of 18 and discussion below. T-11 Josiah Terry, b. c1800 NC also has this value. See Results for comparison
| In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-10, T-38 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 31.3% | 71.62% | 90.88% | 97.45% | 99.35% | 99.84% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
A comparison between T-16 Gideon Terry of King William Co VA and T-38 John W. Terry of Hanover Co VA is shown below. A genetic distance of 3. For an explanation of Genetic Distance for 12, 25, 37 and 67 markers see Terry DNA page.
| In comparing 37 markers, the probability that T-16, T-38 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 13.3% | 50.23% | 78.86% | 92.56% | 97.69% | 99.34% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
T-16 has a mutation at DYS #388 of 14 which apparently occurs much later in the line and no where else in Group 1. DYS #458 value of 18 at first appears to be a pattern in some of the tests; however, T-20 is a documented cousin of T-2 who does not have the marker value of 18. Similarly, at DYS# CDYa a value of 34 is indicated in some tests. Again, T-20 and T-2 do not have this number and are related so this is not a pattern for a sub group within the group. As we get more tests submitted these markers may be significant for others groupings within the Group 1 lineage. The short answer here is if you rule out DYS#388 as a late mutation T-16 is probably closer to the Hanover Virginia Terry men than the test suggests. Again, this shows the importance of 67 marker tests and tests which include traditionally documented branches of a family. Please reference DNA results.
Gideon
Terry, b abt 1753, d 1821 King William Co.
VA m Mary unknown, bef 1786 - Nancy (Terry) Von Behren [nvonbehren AT
msn.com]
See
information and discussion above for T-16.
Nancy is a new member of DAR on Gideon Terry's service.
OoooOoooO
John
(Jack) Terry, Jr. b.
c1780 Va. d. Stewart Co. GA m wife last name Mabry - Jack Morris Terry [jmterry AT pdq.net] T-23
The
sons of John Terry were as follows: Daniel and John Terry.
| In comparing 67 markers, the probability that T-23, T-24 shared a common ancestor within the last.... | |||||
| 4 generations | 8 generations | 12 generations | 16 generations | 20 generations | 24 generations |
| 71.3% | 95.06% | 99.28% | 99.9% | 99.99% | 100% |
|
*The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches. I believe a generation is considered to be 25 years. |
|||||
A comparison of DNA tests between T-23 John (Jack) Terry, Jr. b. c1780 Va. and T-24 Benjamin Terry d. 1771 in Pittsylvania County, Virginia indicates they are "Tightly Related". FTDNA suggests "Very few people achieve this close level of a match." Traditional documentation does not exist to confirm this relationship, In 2007, given DNA results, Daniel Terry believed to be the son and of John "Jack" Terry is living next to "genetic" Terry relatives in Stewart County, Georgia in the 1850 census. Daniel Terry who dies in 1864 in Stewart County, Georgia is a brother to David Terry also a son of John "Jack" Terry.
Robert Terry son of Richard H.
Terry and Isabella Powel - [a Great Grandson of Benjamin Terry d. 1771] - Page
116/ Fam1062
John Terry son of Richard H. Terry m. Isabella Powel - [a Great Grandson of
Benjamin Terry d. 1771] - Page 116/ Fam1062
James Terry m. Elizabeth Westmoreland - [Son of Nathaniel and Susan Lee Powell
and a Great Grandson of Benjamin Terry d. 1771] - Page 116/ Fam 1056
Richard H. Terry m Isabella Powel - [Son of Robert Terry and Susanna Saunders
and a Grandson of of Benjamin Terry d. 1771] - Page 119/ Fam 1096
Daniel Terry m. Elizabeth Gunn [son of John "Jack" Terry] - Page 57/ Fam 258 Curiously, he names his male sons: Lewis T., George, John T., Nathaniel, David, Peyton Reynolds, Charles Banks and Christopher Terry. Daniel Terry dies 1864 in Stewart County, Georgia.
David Terry m. Susan Forrest [son of John "Jack" Terry] names his male children: John Jackson, Albert, Daniel W., DeWitt C., James M., George T. and Robert R. Terry.
The fact that Daniel Terry is born in North Carolina and brother David is born in Georiga is not inconsistent with the pattern of migration of some of Benjamin Terry's d. 1771 children and grandchildren. Some are found in Orange/Caswell, County North Carolina and later in Abbeville District, South Carolina.
Additionally, T-23 John (Jack) Terry, Jr. b. c1780 Va. is genetically related on 67 markers to the following:
T-24
Benjamin
Terry, m Elizabeth [probably Dickerson] d 1771 Pittsylvania Co. VA - David K. Terry [dkt4ster AT hotmail.com] -
Genetic distance of 2, "Tightly Related" according to FTDNA.
T-20 Stephen
Terry, m Sarah ??, d 19 Dec 1769 Craven Co. SC
- Mary
Terry Webster [bee-gard AT att.net]
- Genetic distance of 2, "Tightly Related" according to FTDNA.
T-11
Josiah
Terry, b.
c1800 NC m. Suvicy Perry -
Stephen Terry [sdterry AT eos.ncsu.edu] - Genetic distance of 3, "Tightly Related" according to FTDNA.
T-16
Gideon
Terry, b abt 1753, d 1821 King William Co.,
VA m Mary Unknown, bef 1786 - James William Terry
[jwterry99 AT yahoo.com] - Genetic distance of 3, " Related" according to FTDNA.
T-2
Stephen
Terry, m Sarah ??, d 19 Dec 1769 Craven Co. SC -
Mike Terry [mterry3158
AT sbcglobal.net] Genetic distance of 4, "Related" according to FTDNA.
T-46
William B. Terry,
b 1797 d 1878 Orange Co
NC m Elizabeth J. Brown 13 Sep 1824 -
David Nicks Terry- [dterry5
AT nc.rr.com] Genetic distance of 4, "Related"
according to FTDNA.
OoooOoooO
Henry Terry, b. VA, ca 1725 m. Margarat, d. VA.,
1784 - Bill [wwilliamdterry
AT aol.com]